FutureCopLGF's game Reviews on Newgrounds

[Leap Hero]

Developer, you really need to take a good, long hard look at yourself because I fear that you might be insane.

Why in the world did you hide an excellent Celeste-esque challenging precision platformer with smooth feeling physics and a unique tongue grapple mechanic behind not only one of the most boring bog-standard platformer segments, but then try to actually dissuade the player from continuing? I mean, do you want people to hate your game and miss out? Part of me admires the courage, but as said before, another part of me questions your sanity. Seriously, 9 times out of 10 I would've quit at around the second or third level of the starting sequence because it bored the hell out of me and I would feel fully within my right to assume the rest of the game would be just as boring.

So yeah, as said, the game is definitely pretty neato in many respects (at least eventually), but it does have some rough patches (yes, other than the fact that it starts terribly).

*For one, I found the most satisfying aspect of the game was jumping on enemies, but not only is this discouraged by the sword, but enemies are inconsistent in what you can jump on: for example, why can you not jump on bees when they would be the most exciting to be able to jump on for air travel? I can understand not being able to jump on porcupines, sure, they are spiky, but a bee's stinger isn't on its head! I'm hopefully that jumping on enemies becomes the main attack as the game goes on because it is infinitely more interesting and satisfying than the sword.

*During the platforming, I would have a lot of times where the spikes would screw me over by having hitboxes that were a bit too large. For example, I would tongue grapple so as to fly through a narrow gap that has spikes on the ceiling and floor, yet I would scratch a spike as I go through and die: if my tongue was able to go through without hitting spikes, so should I! There were also times where the spikes were just placed in very annoying spots that you wouldn't be able to see ahead of time, turning it into an unfair bit of trial-and-error until you memorize everything, and even then it's annoying to make jumps to platforms you can't see.

*The boss fight was pretty neat, but it was a bit tiresome with how much it forces you to wait: would like if it was a bit sped-up and not idle around as long as it does.

Again, I can appreciate that the game 'gets good' after a bit, but I would much prefer if the game just started good in the first place! You do you if you want to be a crazy auteur performance artist who isn't afraid of getting an unfair impression from impatient people (who have every right to be impatient), I guess! At least I made it far enough this time, haha!

tkab-games responds:

OMG thank you so much for the review, all I can say is.... YES WE ARE CRAZY xD the purpose of this demo is to really test how much we could hide the game selling point.

From what I've seen so far, most people get to the plot twist, but even so the final game will have a shorter "prologue". Thanks a lot :D

[Jimathon Goes To Business]

Quite the funny little game! Reminds me of other similarly goofy games like Kukkiyomi or Warioware or this one puzzle game I forget the name of where you control where the eyes look in social situations.

For the most part I found the game quite fun, being these varied puzzles and interactions to go through that are solved by clicking and dragging in inventive ways, like chucking cars in your way to get through a traffic jam, or more delicately shoveling cereal into your mouth. There were also a lot of fun fourth-wall tricks like clicking and dragging the very tutorial prompt and credits around.

However, I was a bit let-down by how short it was: felt like it was just starting to get good and then bam, it's over. To add insult to injury, it ends with a downer ending of failure that made me really disappointed. It was only by luck that I noticed there is a 'promotion' music credit that made me realize there might be multiple endings: otherwise I wouldn't have thought it would be the case because it wasn't clear whether there was some sort of grading system and how it works.

While I was a bit unsatisfied, take that as a compliment that I got really hooked, and would love to see a more expanded version of this or other similar goofy stories!

As a side note, I did have a bit of a rough time with the controls. For example, I expected that as long as I just pick up the clock and let go, it would crash to the floor with gravity, and then even when I tried to swipe and let go to throw it, sometimes it wouldn't happen. I got used to it, but it was a bit wonky, though luckily getting used to them works as part of what makes it feel like an adventure, I suppose.

jessejayjones responds:

Thank you for the thoughtful review! I'm glad you found it funny and enjoyable! :)
This was done for a game jam by me and my friends over a weekend, so that's why it's so short. There was even an extra mini-game idea we cut for time, and because it didn't fit the control-scheme, where you would mash your keyboard to write business reports, lol!
But I appreciate the feedback, and I'll keep all those thoughts in mind if we ever make another game like this. Cheers!!

[MAGE-KESHIFT]

Wow, it could be my bias as a boss fight lover talking, but I found this to be surprisingly very promising and cool!

It's certainly rough around the edges and unfinished, but the bosses showed a lot of effort put into their unique attack patterns and suitable telegraph animations for them, and the general gameplay of catching the bosses attacks and throwing them right back into their face was very satisfying, especially when combined with the charging mechanic and the risk/reward it brings! In a way, the general gameplay reminds me of something like Titan Souls, but with combat more akin to some sort of weird fusion of Kirby and Sekiro, what with the general way you parry/suck&blow attacks from the boss.

While I did have a good time with this, it definitely was pretty confusing to start out with and there were a lot of weird quibbles that got in the way:

*I spent way too long trying to just smack the enemies with the orb before realizing we were supposed to throw objects at them and the orb was just a tool for that, haha! Maybe the starter room could teach this concept a bit more: I know it subtly tries to by making you throw the key at the door, but maybe it could be a bit more clear.

*Input registration was very unforgiving and a bit annoying. For example, if after an attack, but before you've recovered, you hold down the attack key, it will not start charging when you finish recovering: instead it requires that you wait until you've recovered and then press and hold the attack button anew.

*Collision detection was very odd: there would be times I would charge up and throw an object, but because my back is to the wall and the object was technically behind the wall, it would rebound off the wall and go out-of-bounds. Plenty of other strange bounces as well, and sometimes the feedback from a throw would be difficult to see as they'd just go way too fast to even be seen.

*Found it odd that you can't pick up objects if you walk over to them while already charging: it will only pick them up if you start charging while already next to them at the start. I understand it might be intentional as, in the context of intercepting fireballs thrown at you, it would be too easy if you didn't have to time your button press to nullify them parry-style, but in the context of a rock just being on the ground that you want to pick up, I think it would make sense to be able to scoop it up in such a way.

Definitely found this to be quite the promising prototype that I'd like to see more from!

FishDev responds:

Thank you for the feedback!! I plan on getting back to working on this again once I'm done with another game. Also, thank you so much for the compliments on the boss designs!! I put a lot of work into that, I was pretty inspired by Wizard of Legend. I definitely need to do some balancing though, as I've gotten a lot of complaints about the difficulty haha

- Yup, an actual bonafide tutorial is planned. This was made in just a month for a game jam so I wanted to spend more time on the actual game itself.

- I'm sorry but I'm not sure what you mean by this. Is there any way you could elaborate?

- Lol yeah I've seriously gotta make those walls one-way or something

- I try communicating that by having the range circle flash at the start, that doesn't continue as you charge, but I could use a more noticeable method, the flash is def pretty subtle.

[Calico]

Damn, this is quite the tricky one! Due to it trying to explain the rules as best as it can, as well as having a nice level of polish and presentation to it, I gave it the ol' college try and came out...somewhat understanding it and having fun? Maybe? Maybe not?

I appreciate the inclusion of a tutorial, especially since I feel like Pico-8 games usually cut them since space is at a premium, but unfortunately even with the tutorial, I still felt hopelessly lost as it just drowns you in a bunch of information without enough examples or guidance. Trying to figure out the rules through playing is also a bit tricky since there is no real feedback on a step-by-step basis to guide you: it's only when you complete a large goal that you receive a badge, and since you can't hover over the badges (or various other facets of the interface) to see a tooltip that explains them, that doesn't help much either.

Having said that, I still tried my best to play it. While I couldn't understand the top goals very well, I was able to (I think) successfully intuit a general beginner strategy, which is trying to surround the goal tiles with matching groups of colors or patterns as a primary focus, while at the same time trying to make connected matches of colors to earn badges as a secondary focus. The interplay of these two goals creates some interesting strategy of figuring out where to use colors or patterns and where to arrange them to maximize points, especially when you combine it with the outer tiles as well. I'm still lost on the larger goals to strive for and other rules, but I felt like I was able to at least get this much from the tutorial and have a decent time, so well done in that regard!

LouieChapm responds:

I really appreciate this writeup ! The tutorial I *REALLY* struggled with , trying to fit ~11 pages of board game manuals into a single pico8 cart was tough !

The top goals function more or less the exact same as the colour group badges , a "5+" indicates that you need to have 5 or more tiles of the same pattern in a single interconnected group , and then little shape icons indicate that you need to create that shape with tiles of the same pattern .

Not too complex on it's own , but fighting against all three scoring goals are what made me fall in love with the board game !

Hovering over the badges for a tooltip on how they were awarded is a really good idea ! I wish I had just a couple hundred more tokens xD


Thanks for playing mate ! The comment is appreciated <3

[Space Vikings Demo]

Hmm, it's a decent little top-down shooter with some alright presentation and craftsmanship: if this was something submitted in a game jam, some student project, an early prototype that was looking for feedback before releasing, or something like that, I'd probably feel ok with it and find it quite promising, but since this is supposed to be representative of a final released product that is expected to tantalize and make me pay for it, I feel like that changes the context considerably and makes me much less inclined to be kind. To that end, I find it very lackluster, unfortunately.

As said, there are certainly aspects of it that are quite promising. For the most part, it's got all the basic elements needed for a roguelite shooter, and delivered in a decently polished state. The menus, presentation and general gameplay feel smooth, there's a good level of enemy diversity with well telegraphed attacks, all of the interactions feel mostly intuitive and have explanations/tooltips to help.

On the other side, the game feels incredibly boring in how bog-standard it is: it's just yet another top-down roguelite shooter to add to the enormous pile that has so many other more incredibly examples to choose from, especially since this is lacking any sort of unique idea or twist that it brings to the table. I couldn't even get a feel for what the long-term progression, story, or goal is from the demo: I assume you go down more floors filled with similar rooms but with harder enemies, but I can't say that for sure, and I don't know what kind of unlocks we are getting or why our heroes are doing this.

The boring feeling also extends to the game's lack of juice, both in terms of visuals and audio: combat arenas are empty rooms devoid of any decor or obstacles, combat feels rather dull due to a lack of punchy feedback and the zoomed-out camera that makes everything feel so tiny and inconsequential, enemies feel like placeholder assets that haven't been coded to have animations yet for their attacks, and players feel like placeholders as well due to their lack of animation and lack of being able to see the weapon you're holding in game, instead seeing this lame placeholder arrow.

There were a couple of other annoyances I had playing the game, like not realizing that putting a mod into a gun is a permanent choice that can't be reversed unless you pay a blacksmith for it, and that there's no way to quickswap or assign numbers to guns in your inventory, instead having to awkwardly drag them to the equipment slot mid-combat. The game really didn't do a good job at giving me a glimpse at the possibilities of loot, as all I got was the same log weapon over and over: it was funny the first time, but the second and third? Guess I got unlucky, but for all I know, that's all the loot table has to offer.

Again, it's not that bad of a game and is somewhat promising, but in its current state it's just an average clone with merely the bare essentials in place: it doesn't have anything enticing or a unique identity it brings to the table that would make me want to spend money on it: I may as well just reinstall Gungeon or spend a bit more cash to get something way more worth it.

[Chroma Wheel]

Decent little arcade game! It's simple, but thanks to some moderately juicy feedback and intuitive design, the gameplay is rather addictive and fun: had a good time trying to be efficient at matching the color patterns as time went on and the game got faster and faster. I like that the game only has balls come from the left or right, as if they came from above or the bottom it would feel very unfair given the screen ratio and how far you can look ahead.

The bonus mode was ok, but a bit questionable since all it does is award you a bunch of points all at once, and it's not like you even need to keep a chain/combo up to get it as it just happens inevitably. It's like, mathematically, you could just make every ball give you two points instead of one and just get rid of the bonus mode and it would all equal out. Just feels a bit pointless: I'd like it much better if you need to do something special like a chain/combo to get the bonus mode, and it'd be nice if it gave you health pip as a reward instead of points, perhaps.

It's ok that the game is simple, but it really felt like you see everything it has to offer in no time flat. Was a bit disappointed at the difficulty levels since all they seem to do is change up the amount of health you have: would much prefer if hard mode started you off faster than the other modes, or maybe has more interesting events happen as the game goes on, like balls that have more unique trajectories like spinning around to hit the opposite side (similar to Undyne boss fight).

[FRIDAY NIGHT FUNKIN' REIMAGINED]

Hmm, bit of a mixed bag here! There's definitely a lot of cool stuff in here, but at the same time there's a lot of clunkiness that either hasn't been addressed from the original or has been introduced in this version.

In terms of the good:

*I really liked the cutscenes added to the start and end of each level, along with the little dialogue bubbles on the bottom bar during gameplay: all of it added a great deal of story and character to the experience compared to the original. With this, I think the game is much close to its original Parappa inspirations.

*Overall the story was a pretty cool and inventive cross-over with a nice progression and ending, albeit a bit overly fanfic-y.

*I liked the left-over ghost arrows since they serve as a new feedback to let you know how accurate you were in your note presses.

*I liked the introduction of this whole new mechanic in the third act of having to dodge attacks while still dealing with the usual music gameplay: really adds a whole new level of challenge as you have to split your attention in a wild way.

*It did a decent job at recreating the FnF gameplay and style, for the most part: kinda laggy and a little rough, but mostly there.

And in terms of the bad:

*When I first played the game, since the story was all about Isaac and they're the one in the spotlight, I actually thought I was supposed to be playing as them. Took me awhile to realize I was supposed to be playing as Boyfriend, but can you blame me?

*I really wish the game would show the combo meter and the note grading feedback front-and-center on the note chart instead of putting them across the screen where it's hard to see them while playing: makes it really difficult to determine whether you're hitting the notes and keeping your combo going when you need to lose focus of the note chart just to take a peek.

*I liked the idea of putting dialogue on the bottom bar, but it was very difficult to read it when they were talking during gameplay, particularly on the harder courses where you're too busy paying attention to the notes. They should only talk during a slow period of the song, or you should have voice overs instead, perhaps.

*The third act dodging mechanic was incredibly awkward and confusing: not only does the game only display the tutorial message for barely any time and in a faded opacity so I didn't know what was happening for a longest time, but even when I knew what to do it was difficult to tell when you're getting hit or whether you've dodged and what were the obstacles and so on.

*It feels like the algorithm used for note accuracy detection was off and malfunctioning: not only did I have a lot of notes I felt like I should've hit perfectly get counted as missed, and vice versa, I was also able to get through the third act by just randomly mashing.

*I didn't like how when you miss notes, Boyfriend still continues to sing as if nothing happened when he should stop singing or painfully grunt. By losing this feature, you lose a critical sense of connection and feedback to the character that the original had.

*Boyfriend doesn't talk! He speaks in beeps and boops! You can't just give him normal dialogue bubbles like that: it's illegal!

[CLox in Da Hood 6: Bin Laden Strikes Back]

This was actually quite the pleasant surprise, but I should've known from the start to not doubt Chdonga in the first place, creator of Ritz on a Roll!

Whenever I encounter a game like this that looks like a shitty low-effort hack job, but actually has some high-effort game feel and solid design to it, I'm always happy! Don't get me wrong as I'd still prefer something a bit better constructed than this, but if you look past the silly graphics, there are plenty of good facets like juicy explosive feedback, a decent variety of enemies, fun powerups, actual boss fights with interesting patterns, and a goofy story with all sorts of wacky scenes! I particularly liked a lot of the arcade-y touches, like the way bosses pulse red faster and faster as they get closer to death.

That being said, it is still quite the rough and janky game, intentional or not, so in terms of feedback:

*While I loved the boss fights, I only particularly liked the first one, with the second and third being pretty bad:

The first one was alright in how you need to take care of the minions before being able to take a shot at them: nothing crazy, but decent and you feel in-control.

The second one, however, is the exact opposite where all you can do is play the waiting game and shoot them when they finally decide to come down: felt very boring and was disappointed that they didn't have a more dramatic and cooler second phase besides speeding up, especially considering how important they are in the plot.

Third boss was a similar downer as it makes you wait a lot, and its attacks were very janky and glitchy and hard to work out how to avoid them. I enjoyed it shaking things up by giving you a melee weapon, but it was more an annoyance as you constantly take contact damage from getting too close and it's too difficult to tell whether you're actually hitting him with your swings.

*Found the boss arenas really confusing with the way you can walk past where it looks like you'd be limited to walk and go into the sky. I know, it's probably done that way intentionally as a funny joke, but still, really weird and unintuitive.

So yeah, bit of a mixed bag: I do appreciate that, despite trying to make it very shitpost-y to fit the clock crew theme, you still put some actual hidden effort in there to make a goofy actually-somewhat-enjoyable adventure. However, at the end of the day, it ain't no Cruelty Squad or anything like that unfortunately, as it is still unavoidably quite janky and shitpost-y. Had a better time than I thought I would, but I'd love to see an arcade game from you in the future where you just go all-out in designing it!

Chdonga responds:

Thanks for the review. Also thanks for mentioning the janky final boss. It played fine in Windows mode which is how I playtested the game 9 times outta 10. Sometimes a bug pops up in HTML5 mode that doesn't appear in Windows so I completely missed it.

[OneBit Adventure]

Pretty neat little game! It's very simple in a lot of respects, but it's got a very addictive and juicy appeal to it despite that, similar to an old-school Y's game, where it's very fun to just keep clobbering enemies, leveling up, and getting loot and other upgrades, over and over. While it is generally quite mindless, I was pleasantly surprised to see that there were some bosses and elite enemies that have special attacks and patterns to contend with! The game was no slouch in terms of quality of life either: it had a nice tutorial, everything felt quite intuitive with good feedback, and there were plenty of nice touches like being able to categorize your inventory, the game warning you if you try to sell items you are equipped with, low mana warnings, and so on!

While it was some good simple fun, it wasn't without some frustrations:

*While I can understand wanting the game to be intentionally simple, the game did start to feel quite repetitive and bore me after awhile. Felt like it could stand to have more major events or shake-ups happen more frequently to make you feel like you're progressing, like boss fights and dungeons and music/world changes. Abilities would be nice to have as well: I can see from the screenshots that you do eventually get them, but I was playing for quite some time and saw nothing new. Call me impatient if you want, haha!

*Similar to above, the loot was pretty boring since it was all just the same name stuff but with different numbers (which made it difficult to commit to upgrading a piece since you could get the same piece but better base stats later on), and the skills from leveling up were boring as well since it was just really lame stat increases instead of cool active skills or more unique synergistic passives, you know, stuff that would change up your gameplay in new fresh ways. World upgrades were kinda lame as well since again, they were just lame passive increases: would love something more unique, and it would be cool if they actually changed the world to be more challenging or have interesting modifiers as a bit of yin-yang risk-reward.

*I'm really not on board with this login-bonus-daily-quest-multi-currency-vip-access crap as I really dislike the way it worms in and corrupts facets of the game unfairly. Whatever happened to just earning cool skins by doing cool stuff like getting far into the game and beating a hard boss? Why does everything need to be earned by clocking in every day and checking off a list of menial tasks like a second job? Why does the game need to make upgrades and revives tied to the currency instead of just having you need to use the proper materials and live with your deaths? Call me bias or crazy or whatever, but I just really dislike this stuff.

So yeah, a decent simple-but-fun game, but ultimately feels a bit too simple and repetitive for me long-term, and furthermore I really don't like the whole grindy microtransaction crap since it makes me lose faith in the fairness of its design.

[Clocks of the BBS 2023]

Hmm, a cute little collab, but felt really lackluster not only due to a lack of content, but also a very generic slideshow presentation which felt like the bare minimum you can get away with for these type of things. At least the author's name is delivered in this stylish diagonal layout, I suppose. Also lacks the typical functionality I want from collabs, such as being able to click on user names to go to their Newgrounds profile, as well as a gallery view and zoom function and so on.

Compared to the 2022 entry, and other more creative entries like the BBS Awards which had a unique presentation through a fake Windows OS, this felt like a severe downgrade in effort and creativity: really missing the usual creative layouts and easter eggs/achievos and such that I'd expect from a Little-Rena entry.

I suppose it might be intentional as it's clock crew and they're kind of synonymous with this low-effort schtick, but I dunno: even shitposts, while seemingly lacking effort, only float to the top because they have a hidden charming high-effort to their low-effort facade, if that makes sense.

PachkaNG responds:

Yknow I wish we could’ve gotten more people for this, but it seems the supporter forum is as dead as general so yeah