FutureCopLGF's game Reviews on Newgrounds

[Gravitate]

It's a rather simple game without much to it, but I gotta admit, I found myself getting somewhat addicted to it! There's just something satisfyingly zen or trance-like about the game: it felt really good to get better at going with the flow, feeling out where the center of gravity was, and then setting up gravity slingshots to get to the end with as minimal input adjustments as possible. I think you definitely chose the right words to serve as a prompt to direct the player: don't fight gravity, harness it. Having said that, the game is definitely a little wonky at times, what with sometimes having the next level be won immediately by having the portal spawn right on top of you and such, and the game felt a bit lacking in terms of special effects like audio, but it didn't bother me too much. Bit of a bummer that, for a score game, it didn't get integrates with Newgrounds high score tables: I wanted to get good and flaunt my score for this (though I'm sure people got higher than 45, haha)!

DMG-84 responds:

Thanks for playing, I really enjoyed watching you play it on your stream and I really appreciate the feedback, it was fun watching you ‘get’ it. Keep up the great work!

[RUBRIS]

Oh man, this game is as tricky to review as the puzzle gameplay is, haha!

It definitely looks really cool and professionally made from a graphical standpoint, and the gameplay concept is quite interesting and really mind-bending to wrap my head around and get good at. But man, as much as I tried to get used to it, I just ended up getting so damn frustrated at how backwards the design felt! Every second I was playing this, it counteracted every natural instinct I had: every brain cell was crying out to be able to be able to move/rotate the incoming blocks in different ways or be able to fine-adjust the camera to an inbetween angle so I could see more of the cube I'm working with instead of having my visuals blocked by the very pieces I've already placed.

I guess it's partly my fault for coming in expecting it to be like 3D Tetris from Virtual Boy or other puzzlers which are more focused on the controlling the pieces instead of the receptacle and not accepting the game's rules for what it is, but man, it just felt like it was impossible to get good at this, and not just because of my past influencing me (for example, the not being able to see more of the cube because of it being blocked off by placed pieces and the camera only offering straight-on angles with no x-ray vision was a big issue). To me, I can't really decide if this is some sort of avant-garde puzzler that is breaking conventions and really challenging in a brand-new way, or if it's just an experiment that sounded good on paper but just isn't fun or fleshed out enough on execution.

sarnyoger responds:

humanity just wasn't ready

[Game and Watch: Madness]

Hmm, not bad, but not great either! The Game-and-Watch or Tiger Electronic aesthetic is pretty amusing to look at: I like that authentic look where you can see all the possible sprite positions at all times, though I was a little disappointed that there were so few, as usually these games will have their screen jam-packed with all sorts of sprites, like you could've had some for enemies getting smacked to the side, or for game over with the clown crying, or something. The gameplay was alright, but it got repetitive rather quickly and wasn't anything to write home about, being a simple timing game.

I do have to give you credit though: a lot of these 'game and watch' games seem to be quite lazy and just use the graphics/aesthetic to carry it, but for this one, I actually liked that there was a decent amount of challenge in the patterns and waves you gotta deal with. It still wasn't that deep or addicting in the long-term, but it was more than I thought was gonna get, so not too shabby.

Taka responds:

Thanks for the feedback :3

[Madness Roulette]

Not too shabby, but rather shallow in long-term appeal. I know it's silly to complain about it, but at the end of the day it is just a game of rock/paper/scissors and it doesn't really bring or add anything interesting to the formula. For example, it'd be kind of cool if we could customize our own character avatar like I thought we could (especially since it's online), but the rewards are only characters and you need to play for an inordinate amount of time to get anything, so there's no hook there. The game could've been enhanced with some interactivity, but I was really disappointed that we don't even have to click the trigger to make the shot ourselves as it just goes off automatically in a canned animation: I think having that extra click to actually pull would add so much more intensity and immersion to it. The menus and such are also very bland with stock text and minimal animations that could've added some pizazz, and finally, the death animations aren't gory at all: was really expecting some serious brain matter spilling out of cracked skulls: it's Madness after all!

However, that's not to say it's all bad. I do think the game is rather stylish and charming with a lot of nice touches to it. I like that the music gets more and more intense as the odds get more and more risky with empty chambers being depleted, and I like seeing the characters sweat (though I wish they would also increase in shakiness and sweatiness more as the game goes on as well). I also like that there are unique animations for each of the characters in how they take their turn. And of course, it is rather impressive that it has a whole online feature and lots of prizes to get, even if they do require way too much commitment to get since it's all based on luck after all.

spazgunk responds:

yo thank you so much for the insightful review!!! very much appreciated. 100% takin' this stuff into consideration for the next update :]

[Gardengage]

Really cool concept for a game that felt like a bit of a mixed bag for me!

On one hand, I do think that the concept and mechanics for the game were quite interesting: switching back and forth between side-scrolling and top-down mechanics to find the right path were really fun and mind-bendy at times, and then piling on other mechanics like removing breakable tiles by walking over them in top-down to create a staircase you can jump up in side-scroll mode made me feel really clever. I'm only through world 1 right now and I definitely want to continue onwards to see how it shakes out.

It does have a bit of jankiness to it, though, that kind of made it confusing/frustrating to play. To start, the graphics sometimes remind me of a NES game that is glitching out, or maybe a weird kaizo mario maker level or something: just really slapdash and kind of difficult to parse and look at sometimes. Second, the gameplay felt very awkward at times: my character would get stuck or glitch into platforms, I wasn't sure how to attack enemies in top-down mode, I felt like I was forced to make these really tight jumps that the game isn't flexible enough for, and it felt weird being hit by enemies that are in tiles below me that shouldn't be able to hit me (and even then, I feel like I should kill them because I'm above them even if I'm not jumping). And finally, I wish the map screen was a bit better: would love to move around in it like Super Mario World or something instead of just messing with the menus in the bottom corner.

It's definitely a neat game I think: for me, it just needs something like a polishing pass to make it feel more smooth and not so janky. But I suppose, given the kind of glitchy nature of the concept/theme, it kind of fits in a weird way, haha. I plan on trying to make it further in the game nonetheless!

[Surviving the Snowstorm]

A nice attempt and I think the heart is in the right place, but I'd say it unfortunately falls short of being a good fangame by missing some critical aspects.

For one, the great thing about Henry Stickman games I find is how animated and lively everything is, and that includes the buttons which would usually play out an animation or a sound when you hover over them: the buttons in this, unfortunately, were very lifeless and stiff with no such pizazz or life to them.

The scenarios that played out weren't that unique or inventive either, most just being a silly one-note gag that didn't really use the whole winter situation to enhance it or have the craziness and escalation that most Henry Stickman gags did. Heck, you had two jack-in-the-box scenarios that were practically identical, and then two phone scenarios that were literally identical as they were just copy-paste!

All this just made the game feel rather lazy: just felt like the list of options was bloated with a lot of fluff: I'd say the only ones I really liked were the the jacket, the load save, the teleporter, the go deeper, and maybe the cheese/bomb/radio. It's not all bad: like I said, there were some decent options in there and I liked the stickman animations and such as they looked very authentic, so I think the heart is in the right place: hopefully I don't sound like too much of a jerk, just want to point out some of the hidden aspects that really could help enhance the experience if you revisit.

BioPlant responds:

Thank you for the thoughtful review! I’m currently working on a remake of this game, so your review is much appreciated.

[An Ordinary Adventure]

Goofy little adventure! Part of me wish it had a bit more gameplay besides just walking around (and the one token puzzle) but for the most part, the dialogue and animations were quite charming and amusing and it kept me wanting to see what oddities happened next, so I'll let it slide, haha. What I might not let slide was the constant janky issues where my character would get stuck walking backwards and I'd need to reset it with a jump: I know you put a warning in the description and all that, but at the end of the day, there's gotta be a better way to actually solve the issue than just making an excuse and expecting everyone to roll with it. Anyway, it wasn't the worst issue to tangle with, so again, I'll let it slide, but just a warning for future since it did hurt the presentation and believe me, you cannot count on people reading the description.

midgetsausage responds:

Yeah, it's a pretty bitter pill to swallow that some people just don't read the description and that the bug... thing is hard to fix.
I wish I could go out of my way to fix em, but my Scratch skills are rudimentary at best, and I don't know if Zach can even fix them thanks to Scratch's limitations...

We're still genuinely happy you enjoy the game, really sorry for the constant sudden moonwalking every now and then. But we're glad (and relieved) that you love the bigger picture!
And yeah, the lack of gameplay was something we were real unsure players on Newgrounds would roll along with, but we were tremendously shocked that they did LMAO

[This is You]

Cute story! I'm not full-on deep into my Madness lore or anything so I dunno how canon or anything any of this is, but I found the world and concept very believable, the artwork very charming, the characters quite interesting with their own unique voices and the story very gripping! Was surprised how easily I got sucked into it: I was worried at first that the game would get too quippy, jokey or memey but it never did, and I admire the professionalism at sticking to keeping it real. Definitely coming back to get the rest of the endings later on: so far I've just got the one where I did nothing, but I'm quite intrigued to see the rest (though sometimes tells me there isn't exactly a happy ending no matter what I do...)

vhsdreamland responds:

oh my goodness thank you so much!!! this is such a nice review, thank you for your time!!

[Dominion Ex]

Nice shoot em up! Overall it felt like the game was very satisfying to play with a lot of cool special effects (especially the shockwaves), and I definitely loved the weapons and how they all had their strengths and weaknesses: you gotta be accurate with the rockets but they have great splash damage, the vulcan is decent all-around but you gotta get dangerously close to not suffer from the lack of accuracy, and the plasma is awesome at insta-deleting foes but it overheats so fast so it should only be a last resort. And then there's even the drive where it passively boosts your speed as long as you have it equipped. All these interesting pros and cons made fighting the great and various array of enemies (who are also weak or strong against certain weapons) super interesting as it keeps you active in searching for the best tool to use in the ever-changing situation: very thrilling stuff! Bosses were quite a cool spectacle as well. I felt like the whole ability to just warp out to homebase whenever you want was a bit confusing to come to terms with at first, but I suppose it allowed for some interesting convenience as some people might want to cash out immediately instead of more traditionally waiting for a level end. Well done!

Extar responds:

I'm glad you enjoyed the differences between the weapons, with the enemy immunities I wanted to make it so there's no one strategy that works all the way through, and so there's always at least one enemy who will give you problems regardless of which weapon you use.

Yeah, I let the players go to the hangar at any point so you can kind of upgrade as you're going, although you get more points if you save up more coins before visiting the hangar. Also, you can go back to the hangar to reset the screen if things are getting a bit too hectic :)

Thanks for the the detailed review!

[MADNESS CANVAS INTERACTIVE GALLERY]

I always appreciate these collabs as I think the heart is in the right place in terms of showing these artists some love and showcasing all these great talents, but I have to admit I did feel like this gallery was very lacking.

For one, it's very dry with no real pizazz to highlight or frame the art. It's as basic as it can get with just a simple back-and-forth between bland pages: It think it would be much cooler if the artworks were displayed in a big collage/gallery/poster like what's shown in the description, where you can hover or click parts of the art to see who worked on that part and so on: you know, just something a bit more fancy and interesting to get people to stay.

Furthermore, it felt like the gallery was lacking a lot of key features: for example, you can't click on an artist's name to see their profile, so unfortunately I think a lot of people aren't going to see and follow other artworks from them, which is a bummer because I think the point of a gallery and collab like this is to let people see art and then get to know and love the artist. By not putting an immediate link, you've made it for difficult for people to get connected and show love to the artist when they would want to.

Also, there's no table of contents or index or what-have-you to allow different ways to list, view or search for art that interests a user. By having the gallery be a simple list with only one way and one order, I feel like it unfairly emphasizes whatever you've chosen to be first in the list: everything near the end of the list probably won't be seen or remembered by the usual user as they would get bored or be tired by the time they've made it there, if they make it that far at all.

iamtheangrysons responds:

thank you for your feedback!