FutureCopLGF's game Reviews on Newgrounds

[Space Huggers]

Hmm, for me, this seemed like a pretty cool tech demo, but not quite a fun game yet. I definitely thought that a lot about the game, such as destructive terrain and the way objects react to destruction (like falling and even crushing), the rain/fire effects, ragdolls and so on were pretty neat, but the game itself just felt very aimless, directionless, and bland to me. The lack of music and instructions, randomly generated mish-mash levels that can be a pain to get through, confusing radar which doesn't tell you whether an enemy is above or below you, overly simple combat, and fire being a death sentence lead to me getting bored rather quickly. Looking into it now and seeing that it had to be made to fit such a small file size and such puts it in a new perspective and such, so I understand and appreciate it for that, but it is what it is and just didn't leave a good impression on me in terms of fun. I'd definitely be interested if this does get worked on further with a new enhanced version.

KilledByAPixel responds:

Thank you. When you are on fire, just roll! It's easy to put out the fire. I can understand wanting to see more variety and polished game. The next version is gonna take things to a whole new level.

[Portal Golf]

Pretty cool game! I find the concept and gameplay very fun: intuitive to grasp but with a lot of tricks to learn to get those challenging silver and gold medals. But more so than that, I absolutely love the amount of polish that this game has: the pitch-shifting sounds of collecting coins, the satisfying explosions for collecting medals at the end of levels, the great animated outlines and shaded coins showing your previous run results that let you plan further bit-by-bit, the fluid placement and movement of portals around the walls, and so on and so forth. All of it really gives the whole game a very professional look and feel to it: well done! The only bad things about the game that I could think is that the levels themselves could maybe have a bit more pizazz or something to them instead of just being the same drab walls, and that I wish there were even more levels to go through, haha!

Frenchie14 responds:

Great review and spot on feedback! Looking forward to seeing you play in your monthly review video! :D

[Spooky Music Machine]

Cute little app! Was impressed by the amount of functionality it has, such as the record/play/save options, and I liked the charming olde-style presentation to it all. While the audio is nice, I do wish it had some sort of visual feedback when working with it: felt like the main touch plate was begging for some sort of waveform or sound visualization to appear in it, both to let you know you can interact with it in the first place (I wasted too much time fiddling with knobs, not even realizing I was supposed to put my mouse in the touch plate since it was static) and just to get extra satisfaction, but it's ok and I guess adds to the olde charm. There were some other actions I wish I could do, like click to preserve a position on the touch plate while going to fiddle with the knobs, since as it is now you cannot use knobs while touching the plate since the mouse can only be on one at a time.

Anyway, it was pretty cool! I'd admit though, I was almost expecting some sort of jumpscare, the device starting to act in odd ways or finding hidden scary functionality, haha!

KittyhawkMontrose responds:

Thanks for playing! Yeah, with a mouse, it's pretty limited what you can do, like choosing to use the touchplate or use the sliders, but the cursor on the touch plate is an idea worth exploring. Haha, a jumpscare would've been funny, but we were trying to make a real instrument. Honest. XD

[TREES' ADVENTURE - Demo]

Pretty neat demo, but a little rough on the edges (though of course, being a demo, that is to be expected). I think it definitely has a pretty good core to it for now: speeding around and bouncing off of walls and springs felt great when you get your momentum going. Definitely seems to be going for Sonic-esque gameplay and I'd say it's getting close.

That said, I did feel like the demo was lacking some polish (I know, duh, but still). For one, the game seems to lack any amount of coyote time which made it feel bad whenever I jumped from the edge of a platform and it used my double jump instead of making it count as my first jump. In a similar fashion, walljumping felt very awkward in that if you try to press a direction and jump instead of just jumping (which is very typical), unless you do it perfectly in sync you'll usually just fall off the wall and double-jump instead of actually walljumping: I think there should be a bit more stickiness to walljumping, a bit of a half-second buffer where you can hit a direction without immediately becoming unstuck from the wall. Moving beyond controls, with the power-ups and springboards and such having no sound-effects or sparkles or what-have-you and instead just disappearing instantly made the worlds feel very hollow and unexciting, which also combined with a general lack of direction in terms of their being too many routes and no story to work off of. Finally, and this is just my opinion, but the climbing ability felt a little weird and misplaced with the way it kills your momentum and allows you to go up anywhere: almost felt like cheating when I remembered to use it. Again, it might be that I'm being silly in pointing those things out because they are obvious and going to be addressed in the actual release, but I want to play it safe.

Also, I tried to play this game with a playstation controller and it didn't work unfortunately: just something to note for you to look into if you can!

UnlimitedTrees responds:

thank u. ive been gettin a lot that the game is very unpolished atm and yea, it is what it is. the game's pretty early in development and this demo really is just a little slice of what i have planned, so while the base ideas r there everything is lacking polish which i didnt have the time for with this demo. im glad u and other peopl r able to enjoy this demo, i hope i can rlly make the final game something special so every bit of criticism helps.

for the playstation controller, i dont own one so im unable to test it but i may look into that later down the line. ive mainly tested with an xbox one controller and keyboard, hopefully some day i can make input stuff better and cooler.

[Gravitate]

It's a rather simple game without much to it, but I gotta admit, I found myself getting somewhat addicted to it! There's just something satisfyingly zen or trance-like about the game: it felt really good to get better at going with the flow, feeling out where the center of gravity was, and then setting up gravity slingshots to get to the end with as minimal input adjustments as possible. I think you definitely chose the right words to serve as a prompt to direct the player: don't fight gravity, harness it. Having said that, the game is definitely a little wonky at times, what with sometimes having the next level be won immediately by having the portal spawn right on top of you and such, and the game felt a bit lacking in terms of special effects like audio, but it didn't bother me too much. Bit of a bummer that, for a score game, it didn't get integrates with Newgrounds high score tables: I wanted to get good and flaunt my score for this (though I'm sure people got higher than 45, haha)!

DMG-84 responds:

Thanks for playing, I really enjoyed watching you play it on your stream and I really appreciate the feedback, it was fun watching you ‘get’ it. Keep up the great work!

[RUBRIS]

Oh man, this game is as tricky to review as the puzzle gameplay is, haha!

It definitely looks really cool and professionally made from a graphical standpoint, and the gameplay concept is quite interesting and really mind-bending to wrap my head around and get good at. But man, as much as I tried to get used to it, I just ended up getting so damn frustrated at how backwards the design felt! Every second I was playing this, it counteracted every natural instinct I had: every brain cell was crying out to be able to be able to move/rotate the incoming blocks in different ways or be able to fine-adjust the camera to an inbetween angle so I could see more of the cube I'm working with instead of having my visuals blocked by the very pieces I've already placed.

I guess it's partly my fault for coming in expecting it to be like 3D Tetris from Virtual Boy or other puzzlers which are more focused on the controlling the pieces instead of the receptacle and not accepting the game's rules for what it is, but man, it just felt like it was impossible to get good at this, and not just because of my past influencing me (for example, the not being able to see more of the cube because of it being blocked off by placed pieces and the camera only offering straight-on angles with no x-ray vision was a big issue). To me, I can't really decide if this is some sort of avant-garde puzzler that is breaking conventions and really challenging in a brand-new way, or if it's just an experiment that sounded good on paper but just isn't fun or fleshed out enough on execution.

sarnyoger responds:

humanity just wasn't ready

[Game and Watch: Madness]

Hmm, not bad, but not great either! The Game-and-Watch or Tiger Electronic aesthetic is pretty amusing to look at: I like that authentic look where you can see all the possible sprite positions at all times, though I was a little disappointed that there were so few, as usually these games will have their screen jam-packed with all sorts of sprites, like you could've had some for enemies getting smacked to the side, or for game over with the clown crying, or something. The gameplay was alright, but it got repetitive rather quickly and wasn't anything to write home about, being a simple timing game.

I do have to give you credit though: a lot of these 'game and watch' games seem to be quite lazy and just use the graphics/aesthetic to carry it, but for this one, I actually liked that there was a decent amount of challenge in the patterns and waves you gotta deal with. It still wasn't that deep or addicting in the long-term, but it was more than I thought was gonna get, so not too shabby.

Taka responds:

Thanks for the feedback :3

[Madness Roulette]

Not too shabby, but rather shallow in long-term appeal. I know it's silly to complain about it, but at the end of the day it is just a game of rock/paper/scissors and it doesn't really bring or add anything interesting to the formula. For example, it'd be kind of cool if we could customize our own character avatar like I thought we could (especially since it's online), but the rewards are only characters and you need to play for an inordinate amount of time to get anything, so there's no hook there. The game could've been enhanced with some interactivity, but I was really disappointed that we don't even have to click the trigger to make the shot ourselves as it just goes off automatically in a canned animation: I think having that extra click to actually pull would add so much more intensity and immersion to it. The menus and such are also very bland with stock text and minimal animations that could've added some pizazz, and finally, the death animations aren't gory at all: was really expecting some serious brain matter spilling out of cracked skulls: it's Madness after all!

However, that's not to say it's all bad. I do think the game is rather stylish and charming with a lot of nice touches to it. I like that the music gets more and more intense as the odds get more and more risky with empty chambers being depleted, and I like seeing the characters sweat (though I wish they would also increase in shakiness and sweatiness more as the game goes on as well). I also like that there are unique animations for each of the characters in how they take their turn. And of course, it is rather impressive that it has a whole online feature and lots of prizes to get, even if they do require way too much commitment to get since it's all based on luck after all.

spazgunk responds:

yo thank you so much for the insightful review!!! very much appreciated. 100% takin' this stuff into consideration for the next update :]

[Gardengage]

Really cool concept for a game that felt like a bit of a mixed bag for me!

On one hand, I do think that the concept and mechanics for the game were quite interesting: switching back and forth between side-scrolling and top-down mechanics to find the right path were really fun and mind-bendy at times, and then piling on other mechanics like removing breakable tiles by walking over them in top-down to create a staircase you can jump up in side-scroll mode made me feel really clever. I'm only through world 1 right now and I definitely want to continue onwards to see how it shakes out.

It does have a bit of jankiness to it, though, that kind of made it confusing/frustrating to play. To start, the graphics sometimes remind me of a NES game that is glitching out, or maybe a weird kaizo mario maker level or something: just really slapdash and kind of difficult to parse and look at sometimes. Second, the gameplay felt very awkward at times: my character would get stuck or glitch into platforms, I wasn't sure how to attack enemies in top-down mode, I felt like I was forced to make these really tight jumps that the game isn't flexible enough for, and it felt weird being hit by enemies that are in tiles below me that shouldn't be able to hit me (and even then, I feel like I should kill them because I'm above them even if I'm not jumping). And finally, I wish the map screen was a bit better: would love to move around in it like Super Mario World or something instead of just messing with the menus in the bottom corner.

It's definitely a neat game I think: for me, it just needs something like a polishing pass to make it feel more smooth and not so janky. But I suppose, given the kind of glitchy nature of the concept/theme, it kind of fits in a weird way, haha. I plan on trying to make it further in the game nonetheless!

[Surviving the Snowstorm]

A nice attempt and I think the heart is in the right place, but I'd say it unfortunately falls short of being a good fangame by missing some critical aspects.

For one, the great thing about Henry Stickman games I find is how animated and lively everything is, and that includes the buttons which would usually play out an animation or a sound when you hover over them: the buttons in this, unfortunately, were very lifeless and stiff with no such pizazz or life to them.

The scenarios that played out weren't that unique or inventive either, most just being a silly one-note gag that didn't really use the whole winter situation to enhance it or have the craziness and escalation that most Henry Stickman gags did. Heck, you had two jack-in-the-box scenarios that were practically identical, and then two phone scenarios that were literally identical as they were just copy-paste!

All this just made the game feel rather lazy: just felt like the list of options was bloated with a lot of fluff: I'd say the only ones I really liked were the the jacket, the load save, the teleporter, the go deeper, and maybe the cheese/bomb/radio. It's not all bad: like I said, there were some decent options in there and I liked the stickman animations and such as they looked very authentic, so I think the heart is in the right place: hopefully I don't sound like too much of a jerk, just want to point out some of the hidden aspects that really could help enhance the experience if you revisit.

BioPlant responds:

Thank you for the thoughtful review! I’m currently working on a remake of this game, so your review is much appreciated.