FutureCopLGF's game Reviews on Newgrounds

[Ice And Fire Tower Defence]

Hmm, I think the game is rather cute and I'm always down for a fun tower defense auto-battler game, but I had a really rough time with this as it just felt very confusing and mindless.

I really wanted to engage in a tactical fight with the enemy, but the game just moves too fast and doesn't give enough feedback or information to give me something to go on. It would've been so helpful if there were tooltips where I could learn unit attributes like their role, strength and weaknesses, and it'd also be helpful if I could see how well my troop attacks are doing, such as with damage number pop-ups or health bars, as it all gets lost when they stack up into a chaos of combat where I can't tell if they're attacking or getting damaged, winning or losing.

Because of all that, and the way that resources seemed to keep growing faster than I could spend them, the gameplay just devolved into spamming, with both teams pretty much equalizing in the center and making no progress. I tried to experiment myself to find out unit properties, but it all just gets lost in the chaos due to a lack of feedback.

Perhaps I'm just missing what the ideal strategy is, but I don't think the game is doing well enough at giving me enough information/hints to find it. Still, I think you're on the right track, and the UI and all that was decently put together.

octopus58 responds:

Hello, thanks for checking out the game! I understand it might be a bit intimidating because of the speed, I purposely went more for a think fast and adapt design. There is a wiki article if you are interested describing unit attributes, types, hints, etc but I understand that it not being accessible straight from the game can be a little frustrating. I've seen people adapt a few strategies, and I linked a somewhat simple one in the description as a video, but I do see some people struggle a little with finding an efficient strategy (especially with spacing out troops). I do appreciate the feedback though, it feels good to know all the different thoughts and ideas. Thank you again!

[Sine Surfer]

Hmm, this is a decent little arcade game you got here! The whole aspect of being stuck to a track and only being able to slow down or speed up makes dodging a rather novel experience, and the enemy design, such as the muncher that is always chasing you, adds a nice element of push-and-pull that forces you to speed up away from slow, boring, cautious play. It's a nice, simple game and I had a few times where I got into a really addicted trance state, so well done.

If I did have a few points for feedback they'd be:

I was a bit disappointed that the game didn't evolve past its initial setup: would've loved if, as you reach certain thresholds, the game starts introducing new enemy types, obstacles, and so on. With only a incremental speed upgrade, the game starts to get quite dull, and the unlocking of flavors isn't that exciting.

Speaking about flavors, I was confused on what the point of the flavors were at first. Call me an idiot, but I kept selecting new ones, starting a game, and being confused as to why nothing was different, only to realize later on that you need to press a button to activate them: feels like an unnecessary step as you'd think selecting them would just immediately change it.

Was a bit disappointed that the game doesn't save your previous top score and flavor unlocks on a revisit.

Also, it's a minor wish, but I wish that the character itself would change to reflect its life, instead of the life counter being tucked away in the corner where it is difficult to see in the action. In a manner similar to Balloon Fight, you could've made the character lose a ball for every point of damage they take.

Roverkibb responds:

I'm glad you enjoyed it! I agree that I could have made the flavour selection a bit less complex since a lot of people seemed to have trouble with that. Lots of good suggestions here too. I wanted to keep the game very very simple since it was the first one I planned on fully developing and releasing, but I'll keep your ideas in mind if I ever make a sequel (working title: cosine surfer).

[Shape Crash]

Pretty decent puzzle game you got here! For the most part, it seems like a twist on the suika game which removes the size-growing aspect and replaces it with a more simple and traditional match-to-disappear system. Because of this, I didn't necessarily find it as novel or interesting, but it still felt well put-together in terms of overall construction and presentation. It didn't blow me away, but I didn't hate it either: it's ok.

If I had any complaints they'd be that:

It's not that complex of a game, but I felt like the help/tutorial section could've been done a bit better: right now it's just a big wall of text which is difficult to read. Ideally it could be spaced out or edited to be shorter, or even better, it could be replaced with more images/animations/video demonstrations.

I had a bit of a bad first impression, since I played the game on easy, where it's, well, a bit too easy: there just isn't enough variety in piece types to create a fun sort of stacked-up chaos and improvisation that the game wants, leading to me being bored to tears. I know you could say it's my fault, but I didn't know any better and lacked direction: perhaps the game should just direct the player to the ideal experience with just a single difficulty, or maybe having the difficulty increase as you go up in levels, and so on.

I also really feel like the game needs some music, or more pizazz to make up for the lack of music: without it, the game can be painfully dry and silent.

EDIT: Revisited on hard mode and had a pretty good time: really warmed up to the game! Final score: 7470

JacksonTXG responds:

Aside from the music, I can probably make the experience more catered to the player by making some adjustments to the overall gameplay. For the tutorial, I can see your point, and I'll try to make it short and simple in the future. As for the origin of this game, it's quite simple: I planned to make a Halloween game with the same match concept but with different candies in different sizes, but failed to finish on time. I soon refined the design with this project. Thanks for the feedback, and for playing the game.

[Darkwood]

Hmm, for the most part, I think this is quite a promising little action RPG roguelike: it's got a nice graphical style to it, decent amount of loot, enemy, and event variety, and its quite addictive and satisfying to build up your character and face ever increasing odds.

I couldn't help, though, but have a bit of a rough time with this, despite it being so promising. I don't know if these issues necessarily kill the game for me, but it was quite annoying, like having pebbles in my shoe.

The character movement was very strange to me with the way he awkwardly adjusts and moves irregularly. For instance, if you walk straight in one direction, and then walk immediately in the opposite direction, your character will do a bit of a weird curve, as if they're a car/tank having to u-turn. It's minor, but it just felt really odd and constantly threw me off slightly.

The camera was really annoying with the way it framed the action and made it difficult to look ahead. Despite the level being a big field, the camera attempts to slice it into 'rooms', but without doors/transitions between these 'rooms', there were tons of times that I would get ambushed by enemies that were just off-camera, aka in the next 'room', and it was impossible to see them ahead of time.

Some interactions were very annoying to figure out. For example, I wish it was easier to compare armors and see previews of their positives and negatives, like seeing my stats turn green or red when I hover over an armor piece: whenever I found a new one, I had to hover over each piece and memorize their stats to compare instead of being able to see them both at once. There were also times when I was at a shrine and I wanted to learn what the symbol it was referring to meant, but it doesn't allow me to open my menu to find out until I step away from the shrine: why?

Attacks and damage was also very difficult to parse at times. For example, despite the orc having an obvious swinging animation, it was still possible to just walk into him and die instantly from mere contact: I feel like enemies should either have contact damage or animated damage, not both. Plenty of attacks just felt like they come out of nowhere and can insta-kill you without even knowing what hit you, like the tree boss root attack.

As said, I still think it's a neat game, but there's just a lot of clunkiness, particularly with its core feel, that really ruffled me: if it could just get polished up, I think it'd be great.

ErikSwahn responds:

I am happy for the support! The movement, camera and combat were not the strongest elements for this game I admit. The thing about the orc was a new piece of information. It is important that it feels convincing getting hit by an enemy, so it definitely needs work. Glad you spend time going through the game :)

[ART GALLERY COLLAB]

Hah, a rather amusing art collab! I do like it when an art collab gets creative in its construction, and while this may be a generic slideshow at first glance, the presence of these audio logs of hoity-toity artists overanalyzing the pieces is a novel addition, elevating it far beyond my initial impression.

I'm a bit torn about the low-effort interface aesthetic, though. On one hand it does have a certain weird charm to it, and it can be an amusing juxtaposition to the hoity-toity analysis, as if to say 'why are you talking this so seriously?' But on the other hand, it does, even if its intentional, feel incredibly low-effort, and makes me as a viewer less-inclined to have faith and stick through the whole collab experience. It's important to have art framed and presented properly, just like how food has to be plated for maximum effect, even if technically it tastes the same.

Because of the above, I'm inclined to believe that it might've been better if more effort was put into the interface. For example, if you were to make the interface very high-class and like a museum, with classical music playing: to see these goofy pieces get analyzed as if they were within a fancy wine-and-cheese event would be rather amusing and coincide with the audio logs better, I think! But perhaps I'm overthinking it and not accepting it for what it is.

In addition, as much as it might go against the low-effort aesthetic, I do wish there was a bit more quality-of-life changes in the interface, such as links to the artist's NG profile if you click on their name, as well as a back arrow and a index/gallery view.

Thetageist responds:

That’s an interesting take, and I feel like your suggestion recontextualizes the comedy, though I’m unsure if it’s in a negative or positive way. In the current setup, the narration is more of the punch line than the artworks themselves, because it’s the one thing that doesn’t fit with the rest; what you suggested would make the artworks the unexpected element and therefore into the main punch line.

Looking at it through that lens, I’m actually inclined to agree with you on this one, and I hope this gets tested out in another Art Gallery Collab!

[Dear Edmund]

Hmm, quite the promising management game with tricky balancing of many aspects, including morality! Reminds me a lot of games like Yes Your Grace, Papers Please, Frostpunk and the like. For the most part it has a pretty solid presentation and cool concept, and I was intrigued to play.

At the same time, however, it had a lot of rough aspects that I felt could use some ironing out:

My biggest problem with the game is that it feels rather toothless and unsubtle. Yes, you need to make decisions to try and keep both parties happy lest you run into a game over, so you might need to make some choices you don't like here and there, but the whole crux of this game should be that it's hard to be good and easier to fall into corruption and I just wasn't feeling that. For example, whenever a choice came up where I can earn some coin by being evil, it was incredibly easy to say no, because what the hell do I need money for? I'm a superhuman who doesn't need food to survive, modifications to my house don't provide me any tangible benefits, and I have no attachment to my wife just because the game says I should! Games like Pathologic and Vampyr have strong motivations within gameplay to tempt you towards evil through selfish survival or even the greater good: this doesn't except in very shallow ways. It's so blatantly and cartoonishly black and white instead of having some interesting grey areas.

Dunno what the whole point of the contracts spilling to the ground and needing to be picked up is? Even though you put them on the shelf, they get erased on a save file being loaded, so they don't seem to have any sort of actual importance. I was also disappointed that despite me picking them up beforehand, the guy berated me for not picking them up when he should've recognized that I already had.

The 'accept/refuse' system is a bit awkward at times in how it is handled: for example, when the guy with your wage appears at the end of the shift, it gives you an option to accept or refuse, but either way results in the same thing of you getting your wage, when you'd think refusing would be spitting in their face and not wanting the wage.

Found the money system rather confusing in that you have street budget and personal funds as separate things: don't know why it can't just be one thing and I was confused about how each of them work. For example, I thought, based on the instructions, I was supposed to be not collecting the money in the safe so it goes towards the budget instead of my pockets, but every time I was forced to collect.

Would be nice if there were some quality of life changes, like being able to speed-up or click to complete text being written out. Speaking of text being written out, it seemed silly that it starts to write out the program code for specifying text color before it suddenly transforms back into regular writing. Some of the menu navigation was a bit awkward as well, like I couldn't find the way to go back in the shop menu to the root, being stuck at the end of one of the branches.

Some aspects of the menu and UI were way too tiny, especially when it came to text: could stand to make some things bigger for better readability.

Best of luck in further development!

MindTheGrease responds:

Thank you for the feedback! It’s still in beta so there are many things that need ironing out such as accepting the wage etc. The main mechanics are in place and through feedback I plan on adjusting everything to a release standard.
Cheers mate

[Dave the Game]

Ehh, this was a really weird one for me, as it's a bit of a beautiful mess, in a way!

I actually found it pretty novel that it seemed to lean heavily into some unorthodox controls and physics to create some absolutely bizarre jumping puzzles: in a way, it was rather unique and mindbending to wildly walljump and rocket around! However, the more I played, the more it felt like the game was not properly coded and was just an absolute mess, and any intentionally I assumed previously was either a mistake or an excuse: bad either way.

It's just so bloody unintuitive, janky, and lacking so much quality-of-life or refinement that I gave up. It didn't help either that the game is so tiny and doesn't explain anything effectively, along with having a very boring and grey world. It's a shame since I thought the boss fight was promising at the end, along with some of the level design and little charming bits here and there, but yeah, overall I felt like this needed way more time in the oven. I understand it's a game jam game so you were limited and did what you could, but it is what it is: it's at least neat enough that I'd like to see another attempt from you in future!

TheLoFiBoi responds:

This review was so honest and constructive all i can say is thank you for the insight and for playing the game, and you already know our next projects shall be even better!

[Primo Richards: Case 1]

Hmm, not too shabby of a detective game! Feels like it's doing a decent job recreating that 'ace attorney' visual novel style, and its got some fancy and appealing presentation to it: pretty promising stuff!

In terms of feedback:

I know it's a demo so it's still under development, but the game was pretty rough in some aspects, especially the audio department which had tons of overused sound effects (like the droplet sound) and the music cutting in and out haphazardly. It looks pretty good in most respects, though, so I'm hoping it all gets polished in future!

It can get a bit overly verbose at times. I don't know why, for example, the chief was giving me this whole history lesson and opinion piece on the victim's backstory: not only is it too much front-loaded exposition, it feels like that should be stuff I should be picking up during the case if it is relevant, while the chief, as the hard-ass he is, should just be giving me the bare minimum starting details and let me hit the street pronto!

Maybe it's just me, but I found the rhythm of the character emotes to be a bit strange? The way they emote was just a bit awkward at times, like maybe they return to neutral too quickly instead of staying with their pose, or the explosive effects are a bit too fast and confusing, or how some side characters are frozen and lacking any sort of unique poses compared to main characters, etc.

Nothing major, but there were a few typos and grammar mistakes here and there: nothing enough to hurt comprehension so it's ok, but definitively give it a once-over when you have some time.

I do also wish that there was some more quality-of-life designs, like an easy way to fast-forward text on replays: right now, it always forces you to wait for each line to load and for the characters to do their emotes, and it's a bit awkward to have to hit the arrow on the right instead of just being able to click the text box, or the whole screen, as other visual novels typically do. I also don't know why you made it that interactables like the body in the apartment don't react on mouse-over: I feel like they should act just like the other buttons do where they get highlighted.

arrogancy responds:

Excellent feedback and constructive criticism, thank you!

[Questern]

Huh, quite the interesting little game! Reminds me a lot of those goofy web comics, forum collab works or CYOA stories like Homestuck, or games like the Loathing series. It's a bit of a bummer that I'm not making any choices and am just reading a story, so I somewhat struggle to call it a game, per se, but nevertheless it is a rather charming story with very goofy and amusing art and prose.

I am a bit torn though: as much as I do like the experimental process of audience participation and all that jazz, it's only the lucky ones that come in when it is still being written and not only suggest options, but have their suggestions integrated into the book, that have the most fun. For everyone else, they're just reading a book that isn't finished yet and so have to wait unsatisfied, or feeling bad that their suggestion didn't get selected, or, someday eventually, just reading a completed book, which as funny as it is, has no interactivity to it. Not saying you shouldn't keep what doing what you're doing: shine on you crazy diamond! It's just that I am one of those unlucky ones that is feeling a bit unsatisfied, as much as I do think it is a charming story.

NickJam responds:

Not the creator but I helped with the UI. The story is still ongoing! The description has the link to Laken's suggestions thread. I'd recommend reading up to the latest page before posting there, but the story is still fairly early on and there's plenty of opportunity to jump in and give suggestions on where it goes next :)

[worDefense]

Cute little game! I like the combination of tower defense with word/typing mechanics: that alone is already nice enough to keep my interest, but when you combine it with special abilities and diverse enemy variety and so on, it gets really complex in an interesting way! It's like, the game could've just been about always typing the biggest words, but when you factor in innocent chickens that you want to avoid, or maybe enemies that split, there's actually a lot of strategy involved in what is truly optimal beyond just the biggest words (but then you also need to factor in the bonus for using all letters: maybe its worth sacrificing a chicken for that!) Game is also just very juicy and charming with its general presentation too: well done!

I will admit, though, that parts of the game had me really confused. For example, there were plenty of times where the game allowed me to fire when the word I typed was seemingly gibberish. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt that they were technically real words that I was typing, just unbeknownst to me, but still, weird stuff.

There's also the fact that I found it quite weird that there is no time limit: instead of the enemies coming down over time, they freeze in place until you make your move. Call me an armchair developer if you like, but I feel like this compromises the scoring system, since without any pressure, it just becomes a game of patience where anyone could take all the time in the world to make the most optimal choices, instead of being a game about skill, reactivity and improvisation. Maybe it was an intentional choice to make a more relaxed game, I guess (though if that were the case, you'd think that hurting chickens would only deprive you of an opporunity to get health, not immediately hurt you as well).

amidos2006 responds:

Thanks a lot, there is two modes, normal and hardcore. In hardcore, there is time limit, I wanted to also give people relaxed experience.